Tuesday, December 29, 2009


Seeding the clouds

Does the CIA muck about with our weather?

On 5 December 2009, Spencer Weart, at Global Research, wrote: Environmental Warfare: Climate Modification Schemes

According to Spencer Weart:

1. In 1945, at Princeton, in the USA, John von Neumann and other scientists discussed the idea of modifying weather.

Soviet harvests, for example, could be ruined by creating a drought.

2. The US military involved itself in research into climate and environmental warfare.

The US military spraying Agent Orange in Vietnam

3. Irving Langmuir and his team at General Electric had the idea of seeding clouds with particles, that would make raindrops. Langmuir had the support of the military.

4. The US military Military researced other ways of injecting materials into the atmosphere to alter weather.

5. In a 1955 Fortune magazine article, von Neumann explained that "Microscopic layers of coloured matter spread on an icy surface, or in the atmosphere above one, could inhibit the reflection-radiation process, melt the ice, and change the local climate."

He thought this might force humanity to take a new, global approach to its political problems.

6. In the early 1970s, the U.S. government spent more than twenty million dollars a year on weather modification research.

7. Beginning around 1961, Russian scientists speculated about altering the global climate by strewing dark dust or soot across the Arctic snow and ice. The soot would lessen reflection of sunlight and the air would get warmer.

In 1971 a group of American experts said that "deliberate measures to induce arctic sea ice melting might prove successful and might prove difficult to reverse should they have undesirable side effects."

8. A 1972 U.S. government rain-making operation in South Dakota was followed by a disastrous flood.

Vietnamese victims of Agent Orange

9. The US military used cloud-seeding over the Ho Chi Minh Trail, hoping to increase rainfall and bog down the North Vietnamese Army's supply line in mud.

10. For a few years in the early 1970s, new evidence and arguments led many scientists to suspect that a new ice age was approaching.

HAARP - is being used to create tsunamis and carry out mind control?

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).[1]

Reportedly, its purpose is to investigate the ionosphere and establish whether some of its properties can be used for communication or surveillance purposes.[2]

Started in 1993, the project is proposed to last for a period of twenty years. (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program - Wikipedia.)

According to www.worldnetdaily.com.:

"Months before the end of World War II, an American intelligence agency launched a top-secret project aimed at devising ways to trigger massive earthquakes and tsunamis that would wreak havoc among enemy civilian populations, recently uncovered documents reveal."

According to http://www.nzherald.co.nz/:

"Top-secret wartime experiments were conducted off the coast of Auckland to perfect a tidal wave bomb, declassified files reveal.

"An Auckland University professor seconded to the Army set off a series of underwater explosions triggering mini-tidal waves at Whangaparaoa in 1944 and 1945."


Tuesday, December 08, 2009


1. Climate Change?

"Climate change is now blamed for just about everything...

"Famines and drought have a long history in Ethiopia and development experts have traditionally blamed poor governance and the state’s exclusive, and inefficient, hold on farmland for that.

"But, with the possibility of another famine looming, Meles Zenawi, the country’s prime minister for the past 18 years, has preferred to blame climate change for his country’s woes." - The Economics and Politics of Climate Change

2. Trees?

"85 % of Sumatra's forests are gone." - Rainforests turned into smoldering ruins

3. Big corporations?

"Most rainforests are cleared ... for its timber value and then are followed by farming and ranching operations, even by world giants like Mitsubishi Corporation, Georgia Pacific, Texaco and Unocal."

"Experts agree that by leaving the rainforests intact and harvesting it's many nuts, fruits, oil-producing plants, and medicinal plants, the rainforest has more economic value than if they were cut down to make grazing land for cattle or for timber.

"The latest statistics show that rainforest land converted to cattle operations yields the land owner $60 per acre and if timber is harvested, the land is worth $400 per acre.

"However, if these renewable and sustainable resources are harvested, the land will yield the land owner $2,400 per acre." Rainforest Facts

4. Who to copy?

There is a dispute about global warming.

But, most people agree about the need to look after the environment.

Too many trees are being cut down, too much air is polluted and too many creatures are dying out.

A new report from the charity Oxfam says the world should copy Scotland in environmental policy.

One of Obama’s top advisers says the world must follow Scotland's lead in environmental policy.

Obama's climate adviser praises Scotland

Professor Diana Liverman, the Oxford scientist and presidential adviser, backs the Oxfam report that singles out Scotland as an example for the rest of the world to follow.

Malcolm Fleming, Oxfam's Scottish campaigns manager, said: "Scotland is already leading the world ... with targets guided by science rather than political expediency."

The Oxfam report states 375m people will likely be affected by climate-related disasters by 2015, and that 200m people may need to migrate each year by 2050 because of hunger, environmental degradation and loss of land.

Scotland is expected to provide around 25% of Europe's ALTERNATIVE energy.

Scotland's SNP government is OPPOSED to nuclear energy.

Cuba by Henryk Kotowski

5. We should copy Cuba?

A study of 93 nations has found that only one nation - Cuba - is developing sustainably.

"The wholesale plunder of the planet’s natural resources has brought into sharp focus the necessity for some kind of global (and globally enforceable) regulation of what’s left of the planet’s precious cargo of life.

"But can capitalism undertake such a task?...

"There is a certain irony in the fact that Cuba, through force of circumstance, has had to embark on the construction of a sustainable economy." - Marx, the First Real Globalist

What is the problem with regard to Population and Growth?

There appears to be a problem of over-population - Once it Starts ....

There appears to be an ecological crisis - It's Over

We need to think about over-population - The Crisis of Overpopulation

Photo from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/greenmapsystem/649445907/

Image:CO2 responsibility 1950-2000.svg

Why must we all copy Cuba?

Cubans have high life expectancy and literacy. Cubans do not use much oil.

A study of 93 nations has found that only one nation - Cuba - is developing sustainably.

Cuba is the only nation which:

(1) provides a decent standard of living for its people and

(2) does not consume more than its fair share of the world's resources.

New Scientist (World failing on sustainable development - earth - 03 October 2007 ... / Cuba Flies Lone Flag for Sustainability - Indymedia Ireland) provides the details:

"An international team led by Mathis Wackernagel of the Global Footprint Network looked at how the living conditions and ecological footprints of 93 nations have changed in the last 30 years.

"They used the ecological footprint (EF) index, a tool devised in 1993 by Wackernagel and William Rees, his PhD supervisor at the University of British Columbia, Canada. EF quantifies the area of land required to provide the infrastructure used by a person or a nation, the food and goods they consume, and to reabsorb the waste they produce, using available technology."

We should not copy the poorest countries in Africa because, although they do not consume more than their fair share of resources, they do not have a decent standard of living for all their people.

Under no circumstances should we copy the USA or the United Arab Emirates, because they consume much more than their fair share of resources.





Thursday, December 03, 2009


In Bhopal, in India, a Union Carbide plant, which manufactured pesticides, leaked deadly methyl isocyanate gas during the night of 3 December, 1984. 20,000 people are reported to have died.

There is horrid air pollution in the Mediterranean.

Too many trees are being cut down in Indonesia.

Fish stocks are at risk.

Big US corporations are damaging the planet.

The Pentagon is damaging the planet.

There is to be a summit in Copenhagen.


Michel Chossudovsky, at Global Research, on 30 November 2009 wrote an article entitled: Global Warming: "Fixing the Climate Data around the Policy"

Among the points made:

1. Prior to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, key decisions have already been made at the World Business Summit on Climate Change (WBSCC) held in May 2009.

A summary report has been produced by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on behalf the corporate bosses.

This report has very little to do with environmental protection.

It's about making money.

2. The Copenhagen Summit will not mention the US-NATO led wars and their environmental consequences.

3. The Copenhagen Summit will not mention "weather warfare" or "environmental modification techniques" and climatic warfare.

4. The Copenhagen Summit will divert attention away from the devastation caused by big corporations and by the Pentagon.

5. The carbon trading system is a multibillion money-making operation aimed at helping the money-men.

6. There are indications that the ideas and figures on temperature and greenhouse gas emissions including CO2 have been adjusted and shaped to fit the agenda of the UN Panel on Climate Change.